The Front Steps Price Per Square Foot Debate revisited
I remember seeing a comment on the Front Steps - (great real estate blog too I must say), regarding a listing at 23 Belmont in which one commenter stated, per the tax records, that listing was a ridiculous price per square foot for the location.
Well, apparently the market did not think so because it recently closed (sale price is at the bottom fyi) for $300,000 over its ‘insane’ list price in 12 days on the market with 3 offers.
For what it’s worth I loved the unit and thought it was well priced. My only question was how much were my clients going to have to bid over to win it, and would it be well priced if they did win? These are questions that keep good agents up at night. (As it turns out my clients had to bid zero as they were out of town while the entire process started and finished).
Here’s my trouble with price per square foot totals – and to some extent people who rely solely on numbers to try to determine market value – it is only worth a third of what actual market values are, at least for residential, commercial is a different animal. In residential, where people are going to actually live, the emotional quotient is huge.
Alan Greenspan stated on his interview with Jon Stewart that forecasting hasn’t improved in the past 50 years…if he could figure a way to predict consumer confidence then he would have been way ahead of the curve.
That to me was brilliant because it’s what I’ve been watching for the past 14 years in real estate. If the market responded solely based on facts and numbers prices would never have increased – at least the way they did the past 7 years.
Not that a price per square foot totals should be ignored, simply that they should only be relied upon as part of a bigger picture that takes location, location within the building (if it's a condo) and rarity of whatever type of property you are bidding on (or selling) into account.
Labels: Price per square foot





